|
Post by reasonably_crazy on Sept 11, 2006 15:02:55 GMT -5
I'll tell you when I figure it out.
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Sept 11, 2006 16:15:17 GMT -5
I shall wait *looks at Jackie expectantly*
|
|
|
Post by reasonably_crazy on Sept 12, 2006 2:00:02 GMT -5
Well, you see, there is great wisdom in challenging one who uses circle logic. And I challenged le Gio in terms that were clear and succinct. so therefore, there was great wisdom in that.
... Is my title revoked? 'Cause that would make me sad.
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Sept 12, 2006 5:02:05 GMT -5
...I think it is. You are now merely O Jackie.
|
|
|
Post by reasonably_crazy on Sept 14, 2006 2:20:12 GMT -5
O Jackie? Well, I do love a good vowel. I can come to terms with 'O Jackie.'
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Sept 14, 2006 10:48:24 GMT -5
Very well. Henceforth, you shall be O Jackie. If I can be the Magnificent Thea.
|
|
|
Post by reasonably_crazy on Sept 15, 2006 2:17:55 GMT -5
Pfft, whatever. 'O Jackie' is totally pwned by 'The Magnificent Thea.' Either choose a new adjective for you, or I get 'O Wise Jackie' back. That almost evens out the vowel count in our titles, after all. And that's what's important.
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Sept 15, 2006 11:22:11 GMT -5
*sigh* OKay, you can be O Wise Jackie.
|
|
|
Post by reasonably_crazy on Sept 16, 2006 15:01:47 GMT -5
score. My regards, O Magnificent Thea.
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Sept 17, 2006 10:10:29 GMT -5
No, it's THE Magnificent Thea, O Wise Jackie.
|
|
|
Post by reasonably_crazy on Sept 17, 2006 18:11:05 GMT -5
Apologies. THE Magnificent Thea.
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Sept 22, 2006 10:35:27 GMT -5
*nods* That's better.
|
|
|
Post by reasonably_crazy on Sept 22, 2006 15:10:30 GMT -5
Is "Thea the Magnificent" okay too? Because sometimes that works better grammatically.
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Sept 23, 2006 3:39:19 GMT -5
Very well.
|
|
|
Post by gio on Sept 23, 2006 11:01:37 GMT -5
Hahahaha...
|
|