|
Post by goblingirl on Apr 1, 2006 15:27:55 GMT -5
Damn. That was my second reply.
Fine, we'd both end up people with no eyes, execpt he's be tied up.
|
|
|
Post by Hobbit-eyes on Apr 1, 2006 15:43:23 GMT -5
He doesn't need to see, though.
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Apr 1, 2006 15:51:59 GMT -5
I can barely see without glasses anyway. I'm sure I'd cope.
I'm lying, one of my greatest fears is being totally blind. But still, he'd be tied up.
|
|
|
Post by Hobbit-eyes on Apr 2, 2006 9:16:50 GMT -5
That would annoy him distinctly.
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Apr 2, 2006 9:22:13 GMT -5
Excellent!
|
|
|
Post by Hobbit-eyes on Apr 2, 2006 9:31:43 GMT -5
..... you've never annoyed Alex, have you? People don't tend to get away with it for long.
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Apr 2, 2006 9:34:04 GMT -5
I restate: He'd be tied up.
|
|
|
Post by Hobbit-eyes on Apr 2, 2006 9:38:49 GMT -5
Would you leave him tied up forever?
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Apr 2, 2006 9:39:22 GMT -5
Yes. Unless he gave me a damn good reason not to.
|
|
|
Post by Hobbit-eyes on Apr 2, 2006 9:42:32 GMT -5
Well, he can be extremely persuasive...
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Apr 2, 2006 9:45:10 GMT -5
I know what he is. And the whole, "If you don't let me go I'l kill you." thing wouldn't work either, because if he did, who'd untie him?
|
|
|
Post by Hobbit-eyes on Apr 2, 2006 9:48:12 GMT -5
Not that kind of persuasive...
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Apr 2, 2006 9:49:06 GMT -5
What kind of persuasive then?
|
|
|
Post by Hobbit-eyes on Apr 2, 2006 9:54:44 GMT -5
Offering you what you want... though we are simultaneously discussing this on MSN...
|
|
|
Post by goblingirl on Apr 2, 2006 9:59:29 GMT -5
Exactly. But I DO know what he is, so there's little he could do to persuade me.
|
|