|
Post by Becky on Aug 11, 2005 13:44:01 GMT -5
And in a spectacular fashion.
|
|
|
Post by Oni on Aug 12, 2005 11:00:26 GMT -5
But that cancels one another out. You can't be careful and spectacular at the same time.
|
|
|
Post by Hobbit-eyes on Aug 12, 2005 12:26:45 GMT -5
Yes you can. Look at Aragorn.
|
|
|
Post by Becky on Aug 12, 2005 13:52:50 GMT -5
...
Let's just skip around THAT like it never happened....
But you can be spectacular and careful at the same time as spectularity, while implying it, does not necessarily require recklessness.
|
|
|
Post by Oni on Aug 13, 2005 16:12:20 GMT -5
No, no. It does, if you want it to be properly spectacular.
|
|
|
Post by Becky on Aug 13, 2005 16:52:31 GMT -5
That's not necessarily true as all you would need is for the thing to appear reckless, and it relatively easy to disguise careful planning as recklessness.
|
|
|
Post by Oni on Aug 14, 2005 14:23:17 GMT -5
But the question remains; why would you WANT to disguise recklessness?
|
|
|
Post by Becky on Aug 14, 2005 15:10:07 GMT -5
True indeed. That doesn't mean someone might not want to though.
|
|
|
Post by Oni on Aug 15, 2005 6:35:40 GMT -5
Then, they're just stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Becky on Aug 15, 2005 15:18:52 GMT -5
Yes, but that doesn't make their actions any less spectacular.
|
|
|
Post by reasonably_crazy on Aug 15, 2005 23:45:38 GMT -5
Stupidity can be spectacular...
|
|
|
Post by Oni on Aug 16, 2005 6:12:34 GMT -5
True. But I'm not concerned with stupidity and spectacularousness. The point remains - spectacular and reckless are like that.
|
|
|
Post by Becky on Aug 16, 2005 7:36:50 GMT -5
Yes, but not necessarily mutually exclusive.
|
|
|
Post by Oni on Aug 16, 2005 10:14:55 GMT -5
Are you arguing with the Unofficial Argument Decider Guy? Because I can just go 'Flah' and finish it right now
|
|
|
Post by Becky on Aug 16, 2005 11:42:50 GMT -5
Flah to you too.
|
|